Monthly Archives: August 2012

Preserving a Crime Scene in 360 Degrees

Posted on by

Crime Scene

 

Crime scene investigators use a variety of tools to record a crime scene from notebooks and sketchpads to still cameras and video cameras. VPiX® CSI:360 is something different. This crime scene reconstruction software enables investigators to create images of a crime scene in 360°.

Using a digital camera, a technician snaps photos of a crime scene every 90 degrees. The software blends the images into a spherical panoramic projection. But this is more than a virtual tour of the crime scene. The images can be enhanced with evidence markers that display information about evidence or close-ups of evidence. Interactive crime scenes can be exported to computers or viewed on a mobile device. The FBI and many police departments use the software.

If you want to equip your fictional investigators with this latest technology, then check the CSI:360° website for more information.

Who Are You? (Who, who, who, who)

Posted on by

Finding DNA

 

Technicians painstakingly extract DNA from a few cells recovered from a crime scene. They duplicate segments of the DNA using the polymerase chain reaction. After analyzing the selected DNA fragments, they upload the results into the FBI’s national DNA database, the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) Program. The result: No hits. The DNA profile is not in the database. Now what?

Researchers at Israel’s Tel-Hai Academic College may provide an answer with a DNA composite portrait based on connections between genes and external human traits.

“The new development will provide tons of leads,” research team leader Dani Bercovich told news website NoCamels.com. “We’ll know the sex of the offender and be able to estimate his height, age range, color and type of hair, eye color and ethnic background — even whether he is right or left-handed.”

Regardless of whether this technology is realized, it certainly can find a place in a mystery or crime story.

FBI and DOJ Consider Errors in Forensic Evidence

Posted on by
Questioning forensics

Questioning forensics

 

In the last posting, we saw how an error in DNA analysis can muddy a criminal investigation. But, forensic errors can yield graver consequences, such as a wrongful conviction.

During April 2012, The Washington Post reported that Justice Department officials had known for years about flawed forensic work that might have led to the convictions of potentially innocent people, and that the DOJ had not performed a thorough review of the cases. The Post declared that hair and fiber analyses were subjective and lacked grounding in solid research, and that examiners overstated the significance of a match.

On July 13, the newspaper announced that the DOJ and the FBI launched a review of thousands of criminal cases. The objective is to decide if any defendants were wrongly convicted because of flawed forensic evidence.

The FBI’s post-conviction review will include cases with forensics performed by all FBI Laboratory hair and fiber examiners since at least 1985. These examinations were conducted for both federal and local investigations.

The Washington Post’s story, “Justice Dept., FBI to review use of forensic evidence in thousands of cases,” includes links to articles about the reliability of various types of forensic analysis.

Lab Error Might Have Created False Breakthrough

Posted on by

 

 

DNA molecule unwinding from a chromosome inside the nucleus of a cell. Source: National Human Genome Research Institute.

DNA molecule unwinding from a chromosome inside the nucleus of a cell. Source: National Human Genome Research Institute.

 

On July 10, 2012, The New York Times reported a match between DNA linked to the unsolved 2004 murder of Sarah Fox, a Juilliard student, and DNA recovered from a chain at the site of an Occupy Wall Street protest last March.

Protestors had wrapped the chain around an emergency exit door at a subway station to allow passengers to ride free. A surveillance video revealed people handling the chain, but they wore dark hoods and masks. To find the perpetrators, city officials decided to recover DNA from the chain. That’s when they discovered a match between DNA on the chain and DNA recovered from Sarah Fox’s CD player, which was found near her body.

The news reflects the ability of investigators to extract DNA from skin cells left on doorknobs and other surfaces. These samples are known as “touch DNA.” Recovered weapons are also swabbed for later DNA analysis.

Several surprises quickly followed the news about the DNA match. During the investigation of the 2004 murder, police and the Manhattan district attorney’s office had focused on a construction worker as the primary suspect. They never did find sufficient evidence to charge him. Now, the city reported that the matching DNA does not belong to the prime suspect.

On July 11, The New York Times announced an unexpected development: The DNA match may be due to a lab error. According to an unnamed source, the DNA recovered from skin cells on the student’s CD player and from the chain belong to a Police Department employee who works with the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner.

DNA errors wreak havoc on a criminal investigation. Mystery writers know that the same types of mistakes provide useful plot twists.