Picturing Shoeprints

Shoeprint

Shoeprint in blood on black nylon before enhancement (a) and after enhancement with three techniques (b, c, and d). Source: University of Abertay Dunde.

 

Last week, we saw that forensic scientists at the University of Abertay Dunde (Scotland) invented a way to recover latent fingerprints from foods. Late last year, the university’s scientists announced a new method for visualizing latent shoeprints.

Dr. Kevin Farrugia modified traditional fingerprint visualization techniques to develop the first detailed images of latent footwear marks left on fabric. Farrugia explained that a footwear mark can be created with a contaminant on the sole of the footwear and left on carpet, clothes, or a body.

“However, as the marks fade and become less visible,” Farrugia said, “the pattern on the sole of the shoe, by contrast, becomes much clearer and better defined. And it’s these prints – the ones that we can’t actually see – that are the most useful at a crime scene, especially when it isn’t possible to recover other types of evidence such as fingerprints and DNA, because they can tell you things like what size, and even what brand, of shoe the perpetrator was wearing when they committed the crime.”

These general features are class characteristics of the footwear. A print can reveal even more than this.

“[B]ecause everyone walks differently,” Farrugia explained, “the sole of their shoes will have acquired what we call random and individual characteristics that are specific to that shoe and person, which means, when the police have got a suspect, they can get their shoes, and if the shoes match, it can lead to a conviction.”

For the first time, a method can be used to produce a clear, detailed image of a latent footwear print without damaging it. Farrugia’s technique is effective with both new and old prints, and may be used to reinvestigate cold cases.

You can learn more details about this method at the Abertay University website.

 

Snacking with Conviction

Food behind bars

 

When criminals snack at a crime scene, they leave evidence behind. A bitemark in half-eaten food is one type of evidence. Peckish criminals also leave DNA and fingerprints.

Last week, Ryan Pfeil of the Medford Mail Tribune (Oregon) reported that burglary is a thirsty business. Burglars broke into a house through a garage and stole a flat-screen television, jewelry, and other valuable items. The burglars also took a container of orange juice from the refrigerator, drank from it, and left the container in the garage on their way out. Investigators sent the container to the Oregon State Crime Lab for tests.

Lab techs found DNA and fingerprints on the carton. They also found a match between one DNA sample and a DNA profile in the FBI database. The DNA match led investigators to a 33-year-old man who faces charges of first-degree theft, aggravated theft and burglary.

Around the same time, forensic scientists at the University of Abertay Dunde (Scotland) announced that they recovered latent fingerprints from foods.

“Although there are proven techniques to recover fingerprints from many different surfaces these days, there are some surfaces that remain elusive, such as feathers, human skin, and animal skin,” former crime scene examiner Dennis Gentles explained. “Foods such as fruits and vegetables used to be in that category, because their surfaces vary so much – not just in their color and texture, but in their porosity as well. These factors made recovering fingerprints problematic because some techniques, for example, work on porous surfaces while others only work on non-porous surfaces.”

University scientists overcame the problem by modifying a technique designed to recover fingerprints from the sticky side of adhesive tape. You can learn more about this breakthrough at the Abertay University website.

 

Getting the Ax

pickaxe

 

It won’t inspire an episode for a high-tech forensic TV show, but it’s still a good detective story.

On March 15, Michelle Hunter reported a crime on The Times-Picayune website, a burglary of a New Orleans pharmacy. Somebody had chiseled a hole through the store’s cinderblock wall and crawled through. The burglar left with a load of narcotics, but left a pickaxe behind. The pickaxe had a price sticker from a nearby home improvement store.

Detective Darrin Parent brought the tool to the improvement store, where staff scanned the barcode to determine when and where the axe had been purchased. With this information, they checked the store’s video surveillance footage to watch a man purchase the pickaxe.

An owner of a store near the burgled pharmacy contacted Detective Parent. On the night of the crime, his CCTV camera had captured images of the same man around the time of the burglary. The video footage also recorded the license plate number of the vehicle driven by the suspect.

Warrant in hand, Detective Parent visited the suspect’s house, where he found drugs stolen from the pharmacy. An arrest followed for burglary and drug possession.

DNA and Killer Twins

DNA

 

A criminal who has an identical twin poses a problem: Identical twins arise from identical DNA. The microenvironment of a developing embryo affects the formation of fingerprint patterns. As a result, identical twins (who developed in different microenvironments) have different fingerprints. What happens when a savvy criminal does not leave fingerprints at a crime scene?

Barry Starr of QUEST Northern California tackled this question in his posting entitled, “Genetic Sleuthing, or How to Catch the Right Identical Twin Criminal.” Starr highlights a sexual assault case in Marseille, France. Using video evidence and standard DNA analyses, police identified two suspects who are identical twins. Which twin is the guilty one?

DNA can offer one way to distinguish between a set of identical twins. Twins begin life with identical DNA, but DNA changes. One type of change is called an epigenetic change. “Epigenetic” refers to changes in DNA that affect gene activity without altering nucleotide sequences in DNA. Researchers have found different epigenetic markers in the DNA of identical twins. DNA mutations, caused by chemicals and UV light, also cause small changes in DNA. Why didn’t police in Marseille rush to order DNA tests for epigenetic markers and mutations? The cost of one million euros to perform the tests discouraged that approach.

If you’re planning to include a killer twin in your story, peruse the comments to Starr’s article. You’ll find plenty of ideas about how your investigators might tackle the problem.